Audit Policy Compared To Audit Privilege or Audit Immunity

Many companies and other regulated entities struggle to balance the benefits and risks associated with conducting environmental compliance audits, and more importantly, what to do if non-compliance issues are uncovered, especially in the context of environmental due diligence.

EPA and numerous States have enacted various “audit policies” to reduce the regulatory risks associated with compliance auditing. An “audit policy” generally applies to the settlement of claims for civil penalties for any violations under environmental statutes. It provides incentives (relief from penalties) when regulated entities discover, disclose, and correct certain types of violations. An audit policy may not cover all types of environmental violations and conditions may exist that limit its applicability.

Some States with Self-Disclosure Audit Policies include:

California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Indiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Minnesota
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Vermont
Washington

Improper Waste Disposal Discovered During Facility Audit

An “audit policy” is different than “audit privilege” or “audit immunity”. A number of States have passed self-audit "privilege" and/or "immunity" laws. Most privilege laws protect the disclosure of audit reports. For example, in some states, under specified conditions, an audit report is not admissible as evidence in any civil or criminal proceedings. In most cases immunity state laws, under certain specified conditions, gives a person immunity from fines and in some cases criminal penalties related to non-compliance provided that when the information arises from a self-audit that person makes a voluntary disclosure to the appropriate agency. In exchange, companies may be required to implement pollution prevention and/or an environmental management system.


States with Privilege and/or Immunity Laws include:

Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
Ohio
Oregon
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Wyoming

EPA has clearly stated its opposition to statutory and regulatory audit privilege and immunity laws that exist in some states.

More information on Environmental Compliance Audits and Regulatory Compliance Assessment
Caltha LLP assists Sellers, prospective Buyers and their Lenders in meeting Due Diligence, Environmental Site Assessment and Environmental Review requirements. To request a quote on-line, go to Caltha Environmental Assessment Quote Web Page.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com
or
Caltha LLP Website

CERCLA Financial Responsibly For Mining Industry

Section 108(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 establishes certain authorities concerning financial responsibility requirements. U.S. EPA is currently developing a proposed rule to establish financial responsibly requirements for the hard rock mining sector. EPA has already identified classes of hard rock mining facilities for which financial responsibility requirements will be first developed. In 2009, EPA identified classes of facilities within the Hardrock Mining industry as its priority for the development of financial responsibility requirements under CERCLA Section 108(b). In that notice, “hardrock mining” was defined as the extraction, beneficiation, or processing of metals (e.g., copper, gold, iron, lead, magnesium, molybdenum, silver, uranium, and zinc) and non-metallic, non-fuel minerals (e.g., asbestos, phosphate rock, and sulfur).

The proposed rule will establish requirements for financial responsibility, as well as notification and implementation requirements. EPA currently estimates that the proposed rule will be published in April 2011.

Caltha LLP assists Sellers, prospective Buyers and their Lenders in meeting Due Diligence, Environmental Site Assessment and Environmental Review requirements. To request a quote on-line, go to Caltha Environmental Assessment Quote Web Page.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at

info@calthacompany.com

or

Caltha LLP Website

Energy Audit Basics - Types of Energy Audits

Energy efficiency experts generally recognize three levels of energy audits depending on the time and effort spent during the audit and analysis:

Level I, basic. This approach involves a cursory analysis of energy bills and a brief survey of the building to produce a rough estimate of how efficiently energy is used in the building. This level of effort will detect at least some of the "low-hanging fruit" and may suggest other options worthy of more study, but should never be viewed as comprehensive.

Level II, intermediate. This method provides a breakdown of how energy is used in the building as well as a broader range of savings options, including simple capital investments. It accounts for the "people factor" and its effect on uncertainty of savings, and also explores maintenance procedures and assesses any impacts savings measures may have on them.

Level III, advanced. This analysis digs into the details of any large capital projects you may be considering as a result of previous, simpler audits. Even more detailed data is gathered from field equipment, extensive test measurements are taken which may include spot-measurements and short-term energy monitoring, possible risks are assessed, and intensive engineering and economic analysis produces reliable estimates of project energy and financial performance with the high confidence needed for major capital projects.

Caltha LLP assists building owners and property managers in conducting commercial energy audits. To request a quote on-line, go to Caltha Quote Web Page.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at

info@calthacompany.com

or

Caltha LLP Website

Should a Property Seller Conduct a Phase 1 Assessment?

In most property transactions, the Buyer and the Lender(s) have a keen interest in the condition of the property. This information, in part, is , of course, used to determine the fair price offered for the property and/or business. During this period, the Seller is most vulnerable –information gathered by the Buyer can be used to negotiate a lower purchase price. But, more importantly, a Seller can be responsible for any clean up or other actions required, whether or not the Buyer actually closes on the property. This information also becomes part of the record which may need to be disclosed to future prospective Buyers, in the event that the current Buyer drops out.

Therefore, Sellers need to be actively involved in all assessments of their properties. This article highlights some of the key considerations all Sellers should bear in mind.

First –expect that prospective Buyers will conduct an environmental assessment of the property. Because Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) are available to prospective purchasers only if they performed an Environmental Site Assessment prior to closing, many Buyers will routinely conduct an assessment, regardless of any perceived risks. Beyond this, most Lenders will require some level of environmental review prior to issuing any loans. Assuming that prospective Buyers will want some level of environmental assessment, the first question Sellers should ask themselves is whether or not to conduct an assessment themselves, and provide a copy of the report to perspective Buyers. This obviously adds a small “up front” cost to selling the property; however, there are some clear benefits with this approach…

• Allows the Seller to preview the same information the Buyer will have access to;
• Identifies any issues early, allowing time to address them, rather than learning of issues from the Buyer late in the transaction process;
• Avoids further environmental reviews, if the reports are accepted by the Buyer and/or Lender

Caltha LLP assists Sellers, prospective Buyers and their Lenders in meeting Due Diligence, Environmental Site Assessment and Environmental Review requirements. To request a quote on-line, go to Caltha Environmental Assessment Quote Web Page.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com
or
Caltha LLP Website

Environmental Assessment of Rural Agricultural Or Forestland Properties

Conducting a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for a large, predominately undeveloped property presents special challenges when using the ASTM Standard Method E 1527 (Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process). A different ASTM Standard, E 2247 – 08 (Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process for Forestland or Rural Property) was developed to address these issues. The purpose of E 2247 – 08 standard is to define good procedures for conducting a Phase I environmental site assessment of forestland or rural properties. To qualify for use of the ASTM standard, the property needs to meet certain criteria relating to size and land uses.

Like other ASTM standard practices, a valid ESA must be conduct by professionals meeting specific qualification requirements.

As with other ASTM standards for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, the standard only addresses 1) contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and 2) petroleum products. Persons using the ESA report might want to consider additional issues which are outside the scope of the Phase I ESA, including:

• Asbestos-Containing Building Materials,
• Best Management Practices,
• Radon,
• Lead-Based Paint,
• Lead in Drinking Water,
• Wetlands,
• Regulatory compliance,
• Cultural and historic resources,
• Industrial hygiene,
• Health and safety,
• Ecological resources,
• Endangered species,
• Indoor air quality,
• Biological agents, and
• Mold.
  

Caltha LLP assists prospective Buyers and their Lenders in meeting Due Diligence, Environmental Site Assessment and Environmental Review requirements. To request a quote on-line, go to Caltha Environmental Assessment Quote Web Page.

For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com
or
Caltha LLP Website